WORLD JOURNAL OF ADVANCE
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH

( An ISO 9001:2015 Certified International Journal )

An International Peer Review Journal for Medical Science and Pharma Professionals

An Official Publication of Society for Advance Healthcare Research (Reg. No. : 01/01/01/31674/16)

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) has indexed with various reputed international bodies like : Google Scholar , Index Copernicus , SOCOLAR, China , Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN , Cosmos Impact Factor , Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) , UDLedge Science Citation Index , International Impact Factor Services , International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF) , Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF) , IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality , International Scientific Indexing, UAE (ISI) (Under Process) , International Impact Factor Services (IIFS) , Web of Science Group (Under Process) , Directory of Research Journals Indexing , Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI) , International Scientific Indexing ( ISI ) , Academia , Scope Database , Research Publication Rating and Indexing , Doi-Digital Online Identifier , ISSN National Centre , Zenodo Indexing , International CODEN Service, USA , 

ISSN 2457-0400

Impact Factor  :  7.675

WJAHR Citation

  All Since 2020
 Citation  105  60
 h-index  4  4
 i10-index  3  2

News & Updation

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Dear Researcher, Article Invited for Publication  in WJAHR coming Issue.

  • WJAHR: New Impact Factor

    WJAHR Impact Factor has been Increased from  5.464 to 7.675 for Year 2026.

  • WJAHR: MARCH ISSUE PUBLISHED

    MARCH 2026 Issue has been successfully launched on MARCH 2026.

  • New Issue Published

    Its Our pleasure to inform you that, WJAHR March 2026 Issue has been Published, Kindly check it on https://www.wjahr.com/home/current_issues

Best Article Awards

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) is giving Best Article Award in every Issue for Best Article and Issue Certificate of Appreciation to the Authors to promote research activity of scholar.

Best Article of current issue

Download Article : Click here

Indexing

Abstract

COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF HYPER-CVAD VERSUS UKALL PROTOCOLS IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA IN ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS

Fakhraldin Marwan Flaih, Ahmed Mohammad Jaffer, Mohammed S. Abbas, Omar Basheer Badran*

ABSTRACT

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous hematological malignancy requiring intensive chemotherapy. In Iraq, ALL represents the most common hematological malignancy, contributing to 41% of all leukemia cases. Limited comparative data exist on the outcomes of different protocols in Iraqi patient populations. Objective: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of two chemotherapy regimens—Hyper-CVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) and UKALL (United Kingdom Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia)—in adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL at Baghdad Teaching Hospital. Patients and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2018 and included 60 patients aged ≥14 years with newly diagnosed ALL. Patients were treated with either the UKALL protocol (n=31) or the Hyper-CVAD protocol (n=29) based on clinical judgment. Follow-up assessments included complete remission rate at two months (CR2M), overall complete remission (CR), relapse rate, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with survival analysis conducted via the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The cohort comprised 60 patients (58.3% male) with a mean age of 27.83 ± 14.22 years. B-ALL was diagnosed in 70% (n=42) and T-ALL in 30% (n=18). Philadelphia chromosome positivity was 18.3% (n=11). The Hyper-CVAD protocol demonstrated a significantly higher CR2M rate compared to UKALL (93.1% vs. 67.7%, P=0.014). Overall CR was 89.6% for Hyper-CVAD versus 48.4% for UKALL. Relapse and mortality rates were lower in the Hyper-CVAD group (6.9% and 10.3%, respectively) compared to the UKALL group (16.1% and 19.4%, respectively). In the B-ALL subgroup, Hyper-CVAD achieved an 85.7% CR versus 42.8% with UKALL. In the T-ALL subgroup, Hyper-CVAD achieved a 100% CR versus 60% with UKALL. No statistically significant difference was found between the two protocols in terms of overall survival (OS) (P=0.963). Conclusion: The Hyper-CVAD protocol was associated with significantly higher early and overall complete remission rates compared to the UKALL protocol in this patient cohort. However, this improvement in remission did not translate into a statistically significant difference in overall survival, underscoring the need for longer follow-up and consideration of post-remission strategies like transplantation.

[Full Text Article] [Download Certificate]