WORLD JOURNAL OF ADVANCE
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH

( An ISO 9001:2015 Certified International Journal )

An International Peer Review Journal for Medical Science and Pharma Professionals
World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) has indexed with various reputed international bodies like : Google Scholar , Index Copernicus , SOCOLAR, China , Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN , Cosmos Impact Factor , Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) , UDLedge Science Citation Index , International Impact Factor Services , International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF) , IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality , Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF) , International Scientific Indexing, UAE (ISI) (Under Process) , International Impact Factor Services (IIFS) , Web of Science Group (Under Process) , Directory of Research Journals Indexing , Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI) , International Scientific Indexing ( ISI ) , 

ISSN 2457-0400

Impact Factor  :  5.464

News & Updation

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Dear Researcher, Article Invited for Publication  in WJAHR coming Issue.

  • Journal web site support Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Saffari for easy download of article without any trouble.

    .

  • 6th International Conference on Human and Soci

    Venue:FCT Education Resource Center, Abuja- Nigeria                                        September 22-24, 2019

  • WJAHR New Impact Factor

    Its our Pleasure to Inform you that WJAHR Impact Factor has been increased from  4.897 to 5.464 due to high quality Publication at International Level

  • .

    6th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND CURRICULUM STUDIES(ICETC2019) 

     

    Venue: FCT Education Resource Center, Abuja-Nigeria

    September 22-24, 2019

  • WJAHR: MAY ISSUE PUBLISHED

    MAY 2023 Issue has been successfully launched on 1 MAY 2023.

  • New Issue Published

    Its Our pleasure to inform you that, WJAHR May 2023 Issue has been Published, Kindly check it on https://www.wjahr.com/home/current_issues

Best Paper Awards

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR)Honored the authors with best paper award, monthly based on the innovation of research work. Best paper will be selected by our expert panel.

Best Article of current issue

Download Article : Click here

Indexing

  Indexing

  • Google Scholar
  • Index Copernicus
  • SOCOLAR, China
  • Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN
  • Cosmos Impact Factor
  • Scientific Indexing Services (SIS)
  • UDLedge Science Citation Index
  • International Impact Factor Services
  • International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
  • IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality
  • Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF)
  • International Scientific Indexing, UAE (ISI) (Under Process)
  • International Impact Factor Services (IIFS)
  • Web of Science Group (Under Process)
  • Directory of Research Journals Indexing
  • Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI)
  • International Scientific Indexing ( ISI )

Abstract

COMPARISON BETWEEN COHEN'S INCISION AND PFANNENSTIEL'S INCISION IN CESAREAN SECTION ACCORDING TO BENEFITS AND COMPLICATIONS

*Dabdoub Tariq, Naisa Thawra and Yousef Ahmed

ABSTRACT

Background: Cesarean Section is delivery of fetus through incision in uterus after laparotomy. There are many types for abdominal incision during cesarean section such as Cohen incision and Pfannenstiel incision. Cohen's incision is straight line made under the line between anterior superior iliac spine by 3 cm. Pfannenstiel incision is curvilinear incision made above pubic symphysis by 2-3 cm. Objective: Main objective: This study was designed to compare the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions during cesarean deliveries according to operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Second objective: Evaluate effect of Cohen incision and Pfannenstiel incision on maternal recovery. Methods: One hundred pregnant women scheduled for delivery by cesarean section were randomised to either Cohen incision (n=50) or Pfannenstiel incision (=50). Design: Randomised controlled trial. Results: Median operative time was shorter in Cohen incision than Pfannenstiel incision and median intraoperative blood loss was less in Cohen incision than Pfannenstiel incision (p<0.005). Postoperative hospital stay and pain degree were similar between the two techniques. Conclusion: We concluded that Cohen incision in cesarean section reduce operating time and intraoperative blood loss compared to Pfannenstiel incision .

[Full Text Article]